Menu

Admin

About Admin

Posts by Admin :

Broidy - Auschwitz-Birkenau Crematoria Whiteprint (2)

Jeff Jacoby: The drawing that killed my father’s family

, , , , , , , , 0

What a pristine Nazi blueprint reveals about professional complicity in genocide.

By Jeff Jacoby
On Oct. 24, 1941, an Austrian architect named Walter Dejaco sat at a drafting table in the German concentration camp at Auschwitz and sketched a preliminary design for what would soon become the camp’s main crematorium. In its clarity, precision, and carefully calculated dimensions, Dejaco’s drawing plainly reflected his professional training and experience.
It also reflected something new in the history of architecture. What Dejaco — a Nazi loyalist who had joined the SS in 1933 — drafted that day was the first rendering of a facility capable of incinerating human remains on an industrial scale. Over the next few months, his initial concept would be expanded into a crematorium with the capacity to incinerate 1,440 corpses per day. It was the first of four massive crematoria that would eventually be operating in Auschwitz, where 1.1 million people, nearly all of them Jews, would be murdered by Nazi Germany.
In the spring of 1944, my father and his family entered Auschwitz in a sealed boxcar from Hungary. Within a few hours of their arrival, my father’s parents and two youngest siblings were dead; before long, two older siblings were dead as well. The infrastructure that killed them — the gas chambers, the crematoria, the system for transporting corpses by the thousands to ovens each day so they could be turned to ash and smoke — had been designed by Dejaco and other SS architects: professionals complicit in facilitating genocide.
Earlier this month, I traveled to Los Angeles to see Dejaco’s original 1941 architectural drawing for the Auschwitz crematorium. The schematic, known as a whiteprint (a high-quality type of blueprint), was acquired in 2025 by Elliott Broidy, a businessman and philanthropist. Only two of Dejaco’s initial drawings still survive; the other, locked in a Russian military archive, is inaccessible to Western scholars.
Read the rest of Jeff Jacoby’s powerful piece in The Boston Globe. 
Elliott Broidy Auschwitz gate

Elliott Broidy in The Jerusalem Post: An original Auschwitz plan, a warning for our time

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , 0

I have acquired an original architectural drawing – a “whiteprint” – of the very first design of the crematoria built in Birkenau as an expansion of Auschwitz by Austrian architect Walter Dejaco.

This piece was originally published in The Jerusalem Post on January 14, 2026.
By Elliott Broidy
The massacre on Bondi Beach brought home to every Jew, everywhere, that no Jew is safe, anywhere.

As an American Jew, I watched the images of the antisemitic attack in Australia with horror – images that, like those of October 7 in Israel, brought back into our present-day lives the antisemitic violence of the past. Alongside this horror was a determination to fight back, using every means at our disposal to ensure that history is not forgotten.

As part of that fight, I have acquired an original architectural drawing – a “whiteprint” – of the very first design of the crematoria built in Birkenau as an expansion of Auschwitz.

Auschwitz concentration camp, operated by Nazi Germany in occupied Poland during the Holocaust.
Auschwitz concentration camp, operated by Nazi Germany in occupied Poland during the Holocaust. (credit: WALLPAPER FLARE)

The term ‘genocide’

The term “genocide” was first used in a legal context at the Nuremberg Trials, which began on November 20, 1945, almost exactly 80 years ago. It was intended to describe Nazi Germany’s systematic project to annihilate, with intent, an ethnic, racial, or religious group: the Jewss.Today, however, the concept of genocide has become debased and misused, most flagrantly in accusations leveled against Israel that it has committed genocide in Gaza. Holocaust deniers, of whom there are still too many for comfort, have been joined by a large and vocal crowd – including the United Nations and governments in Europe – who abuse the term genocide by applying it to Israel’s actions in Gaza.

Prior to acquiring the whiteprint, in 2024, I helped the Counter Extremism Project, a nonprofit organization, purchase a house next door to Auschwitz. Commandant Rudolf Hoss lived there from May 1940 to December 1943, and again in early 1944, with his wife and five children. His chillingly dispassionate approach to the horror he oversaw at Auschwitz was portrayed in the Academy Award-winning film The Zone of Interest.

I obtained the whiteprint from a rabbi in the Los Angeles area, who had been given the document a decade earlier by a collector of Nazi memorabilia known to one of his congregants. The donor had come across it at an auction in Germany without knowing its true historical value.

Whiteprint ‘literally irreplaceable’

In exchange for the whiteprint, I committed to fund $1.5 million for an educational project that the rabbi is currently developing. It is an early-education curriculum on altruistic behavior – a “catch them while they are young” approach to safeguarding children from extremism. The sum is intended to honor the memory of the 1.5 million Jewish children murdered in the Holocaust.

The whiteprint is of immense historical significance. A member of my research team consulted Robert Jan van Pelt, a professor of architecture at the University of Waterloo in Canada and a leading authority on Nazi concentration camp architecture. He authenticated the whiteprint, describing it as “quite literally irreplaceable.”

Van Pelt explained that Dejaco created the design while visiting Auschwitz, where he would have been a guest of Hoss. The crematorium was initially planned to be located next to the Hoss family home, where he lived with his wife and young children. In 1942, the Nazis instead chose to build four crematoria in the nearby camp of Birkenau. These were later blown up by the Nazis as the Soviet Army advanced.

The four crematoria had an incineration capacity of nearly 4,400 corpses per day. Given their central role in the genocide of the Jews, van Pelt noted that Hoss “would have followed this project very intensely. It was a major capital outlay at a time of general rationing of resources like building materials and steel.”

Gassing and burning, starvation and disease

Although historians now estimate that approximately 1.1 million people were murdered at Auschwitz-Birkenau, roughly one million of them Jews, Hoss testified at Nuremberg that he believed the number was far higher. He stated that “at least 2,500,000 victims were executed and exterminated [at Auschwitz] by gassing and burning, and at least another half million succumbed to starvation and disease, making a total of about 3,000,000 dead.” This figure represents about 70% or 80% of all persons sent to Auschwitz as prisoners.”

Today, the two largest crematoria exist only in ruins.

Given the extraordinary rise in antisemitism across the globe and the threat it poses not only to Jews, but to Western civilization itself, we must make it impossible for anyone to deny that the Holocaust occurred. The whiteprint, in effect, makes denial untenable even for the most committed revisionists.

Elliott Broidy is a philanthropist and chairman and CEO of Broidy Capital Holdings, LLC. He is co-chair of the Fund to End Antisemitism, Hate, and Extremism.
Broidy - Auschwitz-Birkenau Crematoria Whiteprint (2)

Philanthropist Elliott Broidy Acquires Rare Auschwitz Crematoria Whiteprint to Combat Antisemitism

, , , , , , , , 0

This piece was originally published on Voice.media on January 6, 2026.

By Alinasir Nasir

Philanthropist and entrepreneur Elliott Broidy has acquired an extremely rare artifact of historical significance: one of only two surviving original architectural drawings—a whiteprint—of the first design of the crematoria at the Auschwitz-Birkenau death camp.

According to Broidy’s announcement, the artifact is “a chilling and irrefutable piece of evidence documenting the start of the systematic, industrialized murder of millions of Jews that defined the Holocaust.”

The only other known copy is held in a Moscow archive that is inaccessible to Western scholars.

Created in October 1941 by SS architect Walter Dejaco under the direction of Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höss, the drawing informed the design of Crematoria II and III at Birkenau, where hundreds of thousands of Jews were murdered beginning in the spring of 1943.

Broidy purchased the document for $1.5 million from Rabbi David Baron of the Temple of the Arts Synagogue in Beverly Hills, California, an amount symbolically honoring the 1.5 million Jewish children murdered in the Holocaust. The funds will support Rabbi Baron’s development of a global early-childhood curriculum focused on empathy and altruism.

In the announcement, Broidy described the whiteprint as crucial evidence at a moment of rising antisemitism and Holocaust denial. “To behold it is to confront the deliberate design of evil,” he said. “My most sincere wish is for this whiteprint to be memorialized as part of an irrefutable body of evidence that negates Holocaust denial and helps to forever silence malevolent revisionists while also educating new generations about the lessons of the Holocaust.”

The document was authenticated by renowned Auschwitz scholar Robert Jan van Pelt, the author of, among other works, Auschwitz, 1270 to the Present (with Deborah Dwork) and The Case for Auschwitz: Evidence from the Irving Trial and an expert witness for the defense in David Irving’s civil libel suit brought against Holocaust historian Deborah Lipstadt.

Van Pelt and another Holocaust historian cited in the press release, Michael Berenbaum, view the document as an especially valuable artifact because it captures the meticulousness with which the Nazis planned, engineered, and implemented mass murder.

Broidy intends to exhibit the artifact at institutions dedicated to Holocaust education and combating antisemitism before donating it permanently to such an institution. He sees this journey as an extension of his broader commitment confronting extremist ideologies, including his help in supporting the purchase and transformation of the former home of Rudolf Höss—located directly next to the Auschwitz concentration camp in Oświęcim, Poland—into the Auschwitz Research Center on Hate, Extremism and Radicalization (ARCHER) at House 88, which fights antisemitism and other forms of extremism with cutting-edge technology. Broidy co-chairs The Fund to End Antisemitism, Extremism and Hate, whose purpose is to support ARCHER at House 88.

“The Nazis sought to erase the humanity of their victims and their very existence,” Broidy said. “This artifact—and the education it will support—reasserts that humanity, helps ensure the continuity of the Jewish people, and works to build ways for all people to see the good in others.”

Gates to Auschwitz Birkenau Concentration Camp

Turning a Blueprint of Death into a Plan of Defiance

, , , , , , , , 0

by Benjamin Raziel

In a year marked by rising antisemitism and an alarming resurgence of Holocaust distortion, one of the most chilling artifacts of the Shoah has quietly emerged into public view—this time, as a weapon against denial rather than a remnant of it. Businessman and philanthropist Elliott Broidy has acquired one of only two known surviving original architectural whiteprints of the crematoria at Auschwitz-Birkenau for $1.5 million, honoring the 1.5 million Jewish children murdered in the Holocaust.

Far from being a collector’s item, the whiteprint is a stark and irrefutable testament to the mechanized precision of Nazi genocide. Drawn in 1941 by SS architect Walter Dejaco under the authority of Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höss, it captures the transition point when Auschwitz was being designed not merely as a concentration camp but as a center for extermination.

The purchase comes at a dark moment for the global Jewish community. In the wake of October 7, antisemitic attacks and hate speech have surged worldwide. The murder of 15 Jews at a Hanukkah celebration last week at Sydney’s Bondi Beach underscored how contemporary antisemitism is as dangerous as ever. At a time when the distance between past and present feels increasingly narrow, evidence matters.

“My ultimate hope is that the reemergence of this document ensures that the fight against antisemitism and extremism continues,” Broidy said. “We cannot forget what happened, but we also have to hold onto hope and equip future generations with knowledge and understanding.”

Leading Holocaust scholar Robert Jan van Pelt, who authenticated the document, described it as the “missing piece.” It is the first iteration of a full-scale crematoria needed for the most lethal killing facilities in human history. The date on the plans, October 24, 1941, indicates they were drafted months before the infamous Wannsee Conference of January 1942 where the implementation of the Final Solution was approved. The plans demonstrate that the infrastructure for mass murder was already being developed months before the conference convened.

As slogans, hashtags and manipulated images spread faster than truth, this physical piece of evidence stands as an antidote. It is not interpretation. It is not narrative. It is the Nazis’ own drawing of how they intended to kill.

And Broidy has no intention of allowing it to gather dust. Instead, it will support an extraordinary new effort unfolding in the shadow of Auschwitz itself.

Earlier this year, the Jewish Journal reported that Höss’ private home—the villa his wife once called a “paradise”—was purchased by the Counter Extremism Project (CEP), with Broidy playing a leading role in the initiative. The property, located at 88 Legionow Street in Oświęcim, Poland – 88 being the numeric representation for “HH” or “Heil Hitler” – sits just outside the fence line of Auschwitz. From its garden and swimming pool, Höss’ children could see the smoke rising from the crematoria.

Today, that same property now has a mezuzah on its front door and has been transformed into a global center dedicated to countering extremism, antisemitism, and hate: The Auschwitz Research Center on Hate, Extremism, and Radicalization, known as ARCHER at House 88.

ARCHER will operate in partnership with CEP, the Auschwitz-Birkenau Museum, and UNESCO, with renowned architect Daniel Libeskind—whose parents survived the Holocaust—leading the property’s redesign. The center will host researchers, policymakers, educators, and activists working on extremism prevention, including financial-network disruption, digital platform safety, and counter-radicalization strategies.

What was once the family home of the architect of Auschwitz will soon become one of the world’s foremost institutions dedicated to dismantling the ideological machinery he helped build.

Broidy’s acquisition of the crematoria whiteprint and the creation of ARCHER are intertwined—not just symbolically, but strategically.

In his recent Wall Street Journal op-ed announcing the acquisition, Broidy wrote that he wanted to take possession of this document so it would be used “as an enduring challenge to anyone who would deny the Holocaust or diminish its magnitude.” He argued that at a time when Holocaust distortion is rising, the most powerful response is to preserve, study, and display original evidence of Nazi intent.

Indeed, Holocaust denial no longer hides on the margins. Since the Hamas massacre of October 7, 2023, antisemitic narratives—old and new—have proliferated across social platforms, college campuses, and public demonstrations. These range from classic denial (“the gas chambers didn’t exist”) to modern distortion (“the Holocaust is exaggerated,” “Israel is committing genocide just like the Nazis,” “Auschwitz was a labor camp”).

The Nazis understood the power of documentation. It is why they tried to destroy their records as the Allies approached. Their failure to eliminate all of them is now our greatest strength. A whiteprint is an inconvenient truth for those who wish to reshape the past for political or ideological purposes. By integrating this artifact into the mission of ARCHER, Broidy positions the whiteprint as both historical evidence and a modern tool of prevention.

Broidy has pledged the proceeds of this acquisition toward a first-of-its-kind early-childhood curriculum centered on altruism, empathy-building, and anti-extremist education. Developed by Rabbi David Baron of the Temple of the Arts Synagogue in Beverly Hills, the curriculum aims to reach children long before extremist ideologies can take root.

The logic is grounded in history. Nazism was not born in the gas chambers; it was cultivated over decades—through propaganda, dehumanization, social engineering, and early indoctrination. The crematoria were the final manifestation of an ideology that began in classrooms, youth groups, newspapers, and public speeches.

Teaching empathy is not a soft response to hate. It is the first firewall against it.

There is a profound, almost poetic symmetry in the fact that the whiteprint—once used to mechanize death—is now being used to educate, inoculate, and confront. There is symmetry, too, in the transformation of House 88—from a place where the Höss family lived comfortably just feet away from mass murder to a global center dedicated to exposing the psychology of radicalization and the machinery of hate.

As Ambassador Mark Wallace, founder of CEP, said during the announcement of House 88:

“The ordinary house of the greatest mass murderer will now be converted into the extraordinary symbol of that fight.” Auschwitz has always forced the world to confront two truths simultaneously: the unimaginable scale of evil, and the unimaginable resilience of those who survived to bear witness. The acquisition of the whiteprint and the creation of ARCHER carry that duality forward. Turning instruments of death into instruments of truth may be one of the most meaningful forms of remembrance and resilience that we have left.

As Broidy’s acquisition makes clear, the fight for historical memory is not an academic exercise. It is an urgent battle in real time—one that demands not only preservation of the past, but active protection of the future. What was once used to plan the destruction of Jewish children will now help protect today’s children from the ideologies that made Auschwitz possible. In that reversal lies a new kind of justice. And perhaps, a new whiteprint for hope.

elliottbroidy

Rare Architectural Drawing of Auschwitz Crematoria Acquired for $1.5 Million

, , , , , , 0

This article original appeared in Space Coast Daily on December 19, 2025.

A rare architectural drawing tied to the earliest design of the Auschwitz-Birkenau crematoria has been acquired by South Florida-based philanthropist and entrepreneur Elliott Broidy. Broidy says he intends to use the artifact to strengthen public understanding of the Holocaust at a moment when antisemitism and denial are again on the rise.

The document—an October 1941 whiteprint created by SS architect Walter Dejaco—is one of only two surviving originals. According to the press release announcing the acquisition, the only other known copy is held in a Moscow archive inaccessible to Western researchers.

Such architectural drawings, including the acquired whiteprint, formed the basis for the crematoria and gas chamber complexes that, beginning in 1943, became the principal killing sites at Birkenau, where hundreds of thousands of Jews were murdered. Scholars have long regarded the technical evolution of these buildings as central to understanding the Nazis’ systematic approach to genocide.

Broidy called the whiteprint “a chilling and irrefutable piece of evidence documenting the start of the systematic, industrialized murder of millions of Jews that defined the Holocaust.” He purchased the artifact for $1.5 million.

The high price tag is not accidental, however—the amount is meant to represent the 1.5 million Jewish children murdered during the Holocaust. The proceeds from the sale of the whiteprint will fund Rabbi David Baron’s global early-childhood curriculum promoting empathy and altruism.

The whiteprint was authenticated by Auschwitz scholar Robert Jan van Pelt, known for his extensive scholarship on the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp’s architectural history.

American Jewish University professor Michael Berenbaum emphasized the value of the whiteprint in illustrating how the Nazi killing apparatus was constructed. “This is one of the most important visual documents showing how the crematoria were created, and showing also the intentionality and professionalism, the intricate detail and the substance, with which the crematoria were thought through,” said Berenbaum.

According to Elliott Broidy, the whiteprint’s value is not only historical but moral. “To behold it is to confront the deliberate design of evil,” he said in the announcement. He hopes the artifact will become part of an “irrefutable body of evidence” capable of countering Holocaust denial and reaching younger generations with the truth of what unfolded at Auschwitz.

Speaking of the document’s significance, Broidy said, “The Nazis sought to erase the humanity of their victims and their very existence. This artifact—and the education it will support—reasserts that humanity, helps ensure the continuity of the Jewish people, and works to build ways for all people to see the good in others.”

Elliott Broidy plans to exhibit the drawing at institutions devoted to Holocaust memory and combating antisemitism before making a permanent donation.

The Boca Raton resident has become known for his involvement in efforts to confront extremism, including helping to acquire the former residence of Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höss in Oświęcim, Poland.

Under the Counter Extremism Project’s initiative, ARCHER, at House 88, the commandant’s house is being transformed into a research center focused on combating antisemitism and radicalization. Broidy co-chairs The Fund to End Antisemitism, Extremism, and Hate, which was created to support ARCHER at House 88.

As Holocaust witnesses dwindle and denial of historical facts increasingly circulates online, the preservation and public display of original documentation, such as this whiteprint, become increasingly important.

The detailed architectural drawing demonstrates that Auschwitz’s crematoria were not improvised structures—they were engineered components of a bureaucratic and industrial system built to carry out genocide. Each surviving document that records this process serves as an antidote to historical amnesia.

Broidy - Auschwitz-Birkenau Crematoria Whiteprint

Boca Raton Couple Preserve a Chilling Document As A Reminder Of The Holocaust’s Dark Path

, , , , , , , , 0

This piece originally appeared in Boca Daily News on December 23, 2025.

By Daniel Nee

As Hanukkah concludes, and menorahs are being dutifully stored away for another year, shining light toward the darkest corners of humanity has rarely seen a time of more importance than the present. Just before the start of a holiday season that became marred by a terrorist attack on a sunny beach in Australia, canceled celebrations in Europe and fears of future tragedies reaching the shores of United States, one Boca Raton couple made it their mission to preserve a disturbing-but-powerful document that shows the literal pencil-to-paper plotting of evil, drawn up as a group of men gathered to discuss a macabre final solution.

Elliott Broidy, 68, has experienced a celebrated career straddling the worlds of defense, diplomacy and philanthropy. A pioneer in leveraging open source intelligence to improve safety and security, he and his wife, Robin, have acquired a rare, real, tangible object that would have made world leaders of the 1940s shudder at the thought of what was being planned. The landscape-style document, a few feet long, set forth a way to manage the horrors of the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp: a physical whiteprint of Crematoria II and III, where the bodies of those whose lives were stolen in the Holocaust would be disposed.

The Broidys acquired the document in exchange for a $1.5 million commitment to efforts that will go toward developing anti-hate and anti-extremism curricula for children. The figure represents the 1.5 million children who were killed in the Holocaust.

The historic document was produced by SS architect Walter Dejaco on Oct. 24, 1941, in preparation for days of meetings in which the logistics of killing at an industrial scale were to be discussed in bureaucratic fashion. Under the leadership of camp commandant Rudolf Höss, two whiteprints were drawn up – one which is locked away in an archive in Moscow, having been seized by Soviet soldiers after the fall of the Nazi regime, and the other which resurfaced in the mid-2010s. The authenticity of the document was in question until it was examined by Dutch professor and Auschwitz historian Robert Jan van Pelt, who linked together the timeline of the meetings of Nazi officials, the location of the document’s origin, and the date of its physical creation, which directly corresponded to the conference led by Höss.

“This is about education,” Robin Broidy said. “Especially for young people. If you understand how this happened once, you’re less likely to accept it happening again.”

One of only two known surviving copies of the original whiteprint of the crematoria at Auschwitz-Birkenau. (Elliott Broidy)

One of only two known surviving copies of the original whiteprint of the crematoria at Auschwitz-Birkenau. (Elliott Broidy)

In a world where it is becoming increasingly difficult to tell if photos and stories are real or the machinations of artificial intelligence platforms, human-authenticated documents such as the crematorium plans provide concrete – rather than theoretical – examples of what extremism can lead to.

“There are still Holocaust deniers in the world,” said Elliott Broidy. “We consulted experts to authenticate the document and learned that only two copies exist — one in Moscow that hasn’t been seen since 1991, and this one. We felt it was important for the public to see it. When the Nazis retreated, they destroyed much of Birkenau and burned many documents. But they forgot the architectural office. That’s why we still have proof of what these buildings were designed for.”

Based on the date of its creation, the planning document was drawn up for what has become known as the Wannsee Conference, the physical meeting of Nazi political and military leadership that produced plans to deport European Jews to facilities in occupied Poland where they would be killed. The result of the conference, named for the Berlin suburb where it was held, is clear. But documents such as the whiteprint help drive home the personal reality of its intent – real people, real plans and real decisions on how to perpetrate a genocide at scale. The plans represented an expansion of a camp that held Soviet POWs to what became the most infamous venue of the Holocaust.

“It shows the earliest planning stages of industrialized mass murder,” said Broidy. “That’s why it’s historically priceless.”

The Broidy family, who relocated to Boca Raton from California to be closer to family and enjoy a more peaceful daily life, have become more active in causes that battle antisemitism and extremism in recent years. With colleagues, they purchased the residential “house next door” to Auschwitz where Höss lived with his family. Photos in the Broidy’s personal collection show parties, children’s birthday celebrations, and joyous gatherings occurring with the death camp’s guard towers and exterior walls in the background. The house – which was the subject of the award-winning 2023 film The Zone of Interest – was acquired as a guarantee not only that history would be preserved, but so it would never become a deranged shrine to what happened mere yards away. The whiteprint added to the context of the prior purchase.

“History may not repeat itself exactly, but hatred persists,” said Robin Broidy. “This document shows how ordinary people were manipulated into participating in evil. It forces people to ask: ‘Am I being manipulated the same way?’”

“If it gives people pause — if it reminds them that this was planned, intentional, and real — then it serves a purpose,” she added.

The physical document has been shipped to a secured location in California where the facilities exist to preserve a sketch that is more than eight decades old, printed on what resembles yellowed newsprint. Its ultimate destination is to be determined – it may find a home at the United States Holocaust Museum in Washington, D.C., on the grounds of the Auschwitz-Birkenau museum in Poland, or another facility with preservation infrastructure. There is a chance, if feasible, that it could be transported to remote locations, giving a larger number of people an opportunity to experience the chilling sight with their own eyes.

“Our rabbi [in California] wanted the proceeds from the project to go toward education, but asked that the document be released,” Broidy said. “He, and we, felt it was important for the public to see it, though ultimately it should rest somewhere that can preserve it properly. While I didn’t have direct relatives affected in the Holocaust, I met many survivors and children of survivors.”

“Over the past few years, antisemitism became a very urgent issue for us,” Elliott Broidy said. “This was the best symbol, the best way to actively combat antisemitism, we could find.”

Broidy - Auschwitz-Birkenau Crematoria Whiteprint (2)

A window into horror: An original drawing of the Auschwitz-Birkenau crematoria sold for $1.5 million

, , , , , 0

This article was originally published on MSN on December 13, 2025.

By Shadab Alam

A profoundly significant, and deeply disturbing, Holocaust artifact has resurfaced — and its new owner hopes it will serve as a bulwark against antisemitism and extremism.

Entrepreneur and philanthropist Elliott Broidy recently announced the acquisition of one of only two known surviving copies of the original whiteprint of the crematoria at Auschwitz-Birkenau. The document, drawn on October 24, 1941 by SS architect Walter Dejaco, represents the earliest design concept of those crematoria, in which hundreds of thousands of Jews were murdered in 1943 and 1944.

The document has been authenticated and explicated by Auschwitz expert Robert Jan Van Pelt, who specializes in the architectural history of the camp.

According to van Pelt, the early architectural sketch “captures the moment when Auschwitz entered the technological imagination: a design that became the prototype for the most lethal killing facilities in human history.” He added that the plan “shows Auschwitz in motion — an architecture first shaped by the murder of Soviet POWs that was, through successive decisions, adapted into the machinery of destruction that resulted in the Holocaust.”

Auschwitz-Birkenau, the sprawling complex in modern-day Poland (during the war, the territory in which Auschwitz is located was annexed by Nazi Germany), was the Nazis’ most murderous death camp. More than one million people, the vast majority of whom were Jewish, were murdered there.

“This whiteprint is physical proof of humanity’s darkest capacity,” Broidy said. “To behold it is to confront the deliberate design of evil. My most sincere wish is for this whiteprint to be memorialized as part of an irrefutable body of evidence that negates Holocaust denial and helps to forever silence malevolent revisionists while also educating new generations about the lessons of the Holocaust.”

Another expert, historian Michael Berenbaum, who held prominent roles at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum and was instrumental in that institution’s creation, emphasized the document’s significance: “This is one of the most important visual documents showing how the crematoria were created, and showing also the intentionality and professionalism, the intricate detail and the substance, with which the crematoria were thought through.”

Broidy purchased the document from a Beverly Hills, CA synagogue, and said that he paid $1.5 million for it — a figure matching the number of Jewish children murdered in the Holocaust — with the money earmarked for a “global early childhood curriculum promoting empathy, altruism, and anti-extremism.”

Broidy plans to exhibit the drawing at institutions dedicated to Holocaust education and combating antisemitism, before ultimately donating it to such an institution. He frames his acquisition of the document as serving the dual purpose of preserving the memory of the Holocaust and confronting today’s resurgent antisemitism and distortion of truth.

Broidy - Auschwitz-Birkenau Crematoria Whiteprint (2)

Rare Auschwitz Artifact Acquired

, , , , , , , , 0

This piece was originally published in the Boca Raton Observer on December 12, 2025.

Elliott Broidy Secures Historic Whiteprint To Combat Holocaust Denial

by 

Boca-based philanthropist Elliott Broidy purchased one of only two existing original architectural whiteprints of the Auschwitz-Birkenau crematoria for $1.5 million, a sum chosen to honor the 1.5 million Jewish children murdered during the Holocaust. Drawn in 1941 by SS architect Walter Dejaco under the direction of Rudolf Höss, this artifact marks the chilling start of the systematic, industrialized murder of Jews.

Authenticated by Auschwitz historian Robert Jan van Pelt, the whiteprint represents what would become Crematoria II and III, the main gas chambers of Birkenau — the massive camp adjacent to Auschwitz.

“This whiteprint is physical proof of humanity’s darkest capacity,” Broidy says. “To behold it is to confront the deliberate design of evil.”

The acquisition was facilitated by Rabbi David Baron of the Temple of the Arts in Beverly Hills, Calif., with proceeds funding a global early childhood curriculum promoting empathy, altruism and anti-extremism. Broidy plans to display the artifact at institutions dedicated to Holocaust education and combating antisemitism before donating it permanently.

Experts say the document is among the most significant visual records of the Holocaust’s intentionality.

“This first crematorium drawing captures the moment when Auschwitz entered the technological imagination,” van Pelt says. “An architecture … that was, through successive decisions, adapted into the machinery of destruction that resulted in the Holocaust.”

Michael Berenbaum, former project director at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, calls it “one of the most important visual documents showing how the crematoria were created.”

The announcement coincides with the 80th anniversary of the Nuremberg Trials, underscoring the enduring need to preserve historical truth amid rising antisemitism and Holocaust denial. Broidy’s efforts extend beyond this acquisition, including support for The Counter Extremism Project and the creation of ARCHER at House 88, a research center adjacent to Auschwitz focused on dismantling hate networks and extremist ideologies.

“The Nazis sought to erase the humanity of their victims,” Broidy says. “This artifact — and the education it will support — reasserts that humanity helps ensure the continuity of the Jewish people and works to build ways for all people to see the good in others.”

For more information, visit archer.counterextremism.com.

Munk-Debate-Michael-Oren

Munk Debate: Should Jewish State Support Creation of Palestinian State?

, , , , , , 0

I wanted to share this great write up by historian and former Israeli ambassador to the U.S. Michael Oren who recently took part in a Munk Debate in Toronto. Mr. Oren is absolutely correct in saying that a Palestinian state after October 7 would be “certifiably insane.” The Palestinians have been offered a state several times, and each time have responded with rejectionism and violence. There is no doubt in my mind that a Palestinian state would only become the launching pad for another October 7.

It was heartening to see that Mr. Oren and former Israeli politician Ayelet Shaked won the debate by a large margin in front of an audience that was overwhelmingly liberal. That speaks to the clarity and seriousness of their argument. A crucial need is to win the debate in the court of public opinion.

Face-Off on a Two-State Resolution

By Michael Oren

Last Wednesday evening, December 3, in Toronto, I took part in a Munk Debate. For those unfamiliar with the institution, Munk defines its mission as helping “the world rediscover civil and substantive public debates by convening the brightest thinkers of our time to weigh in on the big issues of the day.” Previous debates have pitted pro-Israel spokespeople such as Douglas Murray and Natasha Hausdorff against Palestinian advocate Mehdi Hasan and anti-Zionist Israeli Gideon Levy debating whether anti-Zionism is antisemitic. The events are always well-attended-the hall that hosted us seats 4,000-and the level of discourse is usually high. In the land of hockey, Munk supplies a riveting face-off.

But this debate would be different from all its predecessors. In this, two Israelis confronted two other Israelis in debating whether the Jewish State should support the creation of a Palestinian state.

Arguing that the two-state solution was very much in Israel’s interest were former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and former Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni. Arguing against were ex-Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked and this writer. Addressing an overwhelming liberal audience, Ayelet and I were expected to lose, and yet we both viewed the debate as a way of explaining to the world-and especially to those standing by Israel throughout this most difficult period-why two-thirds of all Israelis now oppose the two-state solution. In fact, the overwhelming majority of even center and center-left Israelis, among them many members of my own family, feel that establishing a Palestinian state today, in the aftermath of October 7, is not only not in Israel’s interest but is, far beyond that, certifiably insane.

Much publicity surrounded the debate, virtually all of it negative. Human rights groups, arrogating a right of universal jurisdiction, demanded the arrest of Olmert and Livni for war crimes they allegedly committed while in office. Hundreds of protestors crowded the entrance to the hall, wrestled with police, and delayed the audience’s entry. Some broke past the guards screaming, “War criminals! War criminals!” But finally, if belatedly, the debate began, with Olmert presenting first, followed by Shaked, Livni, and me (you can watch my opening argument below).

We had seven minutes to make our case with three minutes for rebuttal and four for final remarks. I will not attempt to reconstruct our opponent’s arguments. Little was new. In essence, they maintained, failure to support the two-state solution will result in Israel’s isolation in the world and its moral collapse internally. Creating a Palestinian state is the only way to prevent the emergence of a binational state and preserve Israel’s identity as a Jewish, democratic state. Tellingly, Olmert stressed, “I propose a Palestinian state, I propose it not because of them…But first and foremost, I propose it because this is what is good for Israel.” Livni offered no significant additions to this line. Listening to such reasoning, Ayelet and I experienced a deep sense of déjà vu, as if we were not in Toronto in 2025 but in Jerusalem circa 1993.

I won’t attempt to summarize our counter-arguments. Ayelet, a veteran of Israel’s responsible right wing, spoke about our connection and claim to Judea and Samaria and the disastrous results of our attempts to advance Palestinian sovereignty there and in Gaza. I advanced three points: the Palestinians hold the world record, going back to 1937, for rejecting offers of a two-state solution, they’ve shown zero ability to sustain a nation state and, even if they could, would use it for launching the next October 7. Our remarks were peppered with personal stories of the family members and friends we’ve lost to Palestinian terror as well as the recent Palestinian polls showing that the majority of Palestinians still support Hamas and October 7. A decisive seventy percent of Palestinians oppose the two-state solution. About the same portion of Israeli society is against creating a Palestinian state, though for different reasons. The Palestinians are unwilling to pay the price of statehood which is acceptance of a Jewish state in any borders. The Israelis simply want to live.

I urged the audience, “Stand with the vast majority of Israelis who are telling you, ‘We want peace, but we want to live.’” History has demonstrated, again and again, that every attempt at Palestinian statehood has meant death for thousands of Jews.

Rather than providing a précis of what I said in the debate, my purpose here is to share my regret about what I didn’t have time to say-what I would have given an additional three minutes.

Firstly, I would’ve stressed that every time the people of Israel saw a real opportunity for peace-with Egypt, certainly, and with Jordan and the Abraham Accord countries-we were willing to make major sacrifices. The fact that we are unwilling to take risks for peace today is prima facie evidence that no such opportunity exists. There is currently no Palestinian Anwar Sadat or King Hussein of Jordan, no popular support for peace such as that we encounter in the UAE, Morocco, and Bahrain. But, on the contrary, not a single Palestinian leader has ever recognized the existence of the Jewish people, much less our right to self-determination in our ancient homeland. No Palestinian leader has ever agreed to give up the so-called right of return of millions of Palestinian refugees and their descendants to Israel. No Palestinian leader has ever said that his signature on a two-state solution would mean the end of all future Palestinian claims-that the creation of a Palestinian state would not be merely a stepping stone to a one-state solution eliminating Israel.

More crucially than those points, though, was the one I would direct at Olmert and Livni. Their entire arguments were centered on Israel and what they think is good for Israel. The Palestinians were rarely mentioned and, when they were, their role was as silent props for an Israeli morality play. Quite simply, in Olmert and Livni’s world, the Palestinians have no agency, no responsibility for jihadist terror, for teaching their children how to kill Jews and paying salaries to the terrorists who do. In my opponents’ universe there was no rejection of the two-state offers of 1937, 1947, 2000–2001, and 2008, no Second Intifada, no Palestinian election that brought Hamas to power. This is not merely the racism of low expectations. It is the racism of no expectations.

The outcome of the Munk Debates, curiously, is determined by an electronic vote taken before the event begins. Attendees press a button to signify “yes” in favor of the resolution or “no,” against. The winner is determined not by the absolute number of for and against votes but the number of people who changed their votes as a result of hearing the debaters. Contrary to our expectations, Ayelet and I won by a large margin. The Munk management called it “one of the most consequential main stage debates in the seventeen-year history of our series.” For us, it was enough to know simply we’d done our duty.

Later, at our victory dinner, I had the opportunity to reveal my esprit de l’escalier, a French term (remember, this was Canada) for things you wished you would have said in an argument but didn’t. I’ve recorded them all here. Use them, please, the next time you find yourself in a face-off about the two-state solution.

The full debate is available from Munk Debates, here.

Amnesty-International-Hamas-Report-2025

Too Little - Too Late: Amnesty International Concludes Hamas Committed Crimes Against Humanity

, , , , , 0

It took more than two years, but Amnesty International has finally concluded what we knew all along: that Hamas committed crimes against humanity on October 7 and after.

In the comprehensive 173-page report, the nonprofit concluded that Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups committed war crimes and crimes against humanity during and after the October 7, 2023 attacks in Israel.

This was a stark admission to come from an institution with a known anti-Israel stance, and a first public condemnation of Palestinian actors.

Key Findings

The report’s conclusions are based on extensive evidence including video footage, eyewitness testimony, and other documentation. Among the most significant findings:

Intentional Targeting of Civilians: Amnesty rejected Hamas’s claim that civilian deaths resulted from actions by unauthorized individuals, concluding instead that the attacks represented a coordinated, multi-location assault deliberately aimed at civilian populations.

Hostage Treatment: All individuals taken to Gaza are considered to have been unlawfully detained as hostages and subjected to psychological abuse.

Sexual Violence: The report acknowledges documented cases of rape, gang rape, and sexual assault, both during the October 7 attacks and against hostages in captivity.

Multiple Perpetrators: The report explicitly names several groups involved in the attacks, including the Izzadin al-Qassam Brigades (which Amnesty holds chiefly responsible), the Al-Quds Brigades, and the Al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades, along with hundreds of Palestinians in civilian clothing.

Investigation Challenges

Amnesty’s researchers faced significant obstacles during their investigation as many survivors and witnesses were reluctant to speak, and limited forensic evidence had been collected by Israeli authorities.

Despite these challenges, Amnesty stated it gathered substantial evidence to support its conclusions.

How This Differs from UN Findings

Amnesty’s conclusions go further than previous United Nations reports in several key ways. While UN investigations acknowledged possible cases of sexual violence, they did not conclude it was widespread or systematic. The UN also used more cautious language, stating that some of Hamas’s actions “may have” amounted to crimes against humanity, whereas Amnesty makes a definitive determination.

Additionally, Amnesty’s report is more specific in attributing actions to Hamas directly, using insignia, weapons identification, and Hamas’s own media, while UN reports often referred more generally to “armed Palestinian groups.”

The Broader Context

Amnesty International’s willingness to take such a clear stance represents a notable shift in its approach amid ongoing discussions about accountability for the October 7 attacks and the subsequent conflict.

The determination that Hamas’ actions constitute crimes against humanity under international law can have implications for future legal proceedings and diplomatic efforts.

Load More